[Avg. reading time: 8 minutes]
MessagePack
A compact binary data interchange format
What is MessagePack
MessagePack is an efficient binary serialization format designed for fast and compact data exchange between systems.
Core properties
- Compact compared to text formats like JSON
- Fast serialization and deserialization
- Cross-language support across many ecosystems
- Flexible data model with optional extensions
Why MessagePack
MessagePack solves a very specific problem:
- JSON is easy to read but inefficient on the wire
- IoT and distributed systems care about bytes, latency, and CPU
- MessagePack keeps JSON-like simplicity but removes text overhead
In short, JSON Data model with Binary efficiency.
Key Use Cases
- IoT telemetry and device data
- Edge gateways aggregating high-frequency events
- Microservice-to-microservice communication
- Caching layers like Redis and Memcached
- Distributed systems logging and checkpoints
MessagePack vs JSON
- Binary and compact
- Faster to parse
- Smaller payloads for most data
- Not human-readable
- Debugging requires tooling
MessagePack vs CBOR
- MessagePack is simpler and lighter
- CBOR supports semantic tags like datetime and URI
- CBOR supports deterministic encoding for hashing and signatures
- Size differences are workload-dependent, not guaranteed
Comparison with Similar Formats
| Feature | MessagePack | JSON | CBOR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Encoding | Binary | Text | Binary |
| Human-readable | No | Yes | No |
| Data Size | Small (varies) | Large | Small (varies) |
| Schema Required | No | No | No |
| Standardization | Community | RFC 8259 | RFC 8949 |
| Binary Data Support | Native | Base64 | Native |
| Semantic Tags | No | No | Yes |
| Deterministic Encoding | No | No | Yes |
Key Differences:
- vs JSON: 20-30% smaller payloads, faster parsing, but not human-readable
- vs CBOR: More compact for simple types, CBOR has better semantic tagging
Basic Operations
packb()converts Python objects to MessagePack bytesunpackb()converts MessagePack bytes back to Python objects
Python Example
git clone https://github.com/gchandra10/python_messagepack_examples.git
MessagePack in IoT and Edge Systems
- Commonly used in edge gateways and ingestion pipelines
- Efficient for short, frequent telemetry messages
- Suitable for MQTT payloads where the broker is payload-agnostic
- Rarely used directly in regulated firmware layers
Important:
- MQTT does not care about payload format
- MessagePack is an application-layer choice, not a protocol requirement
Summary
When to Choose MessagePack
- Bandwidth or memory is constrained
- JSON is too verbose
- Binary data is common
- Speed matters more than readability
- Schema flexibility is acceptable
What MessagePack Does Not Do
- No schema enforcement
- No backward compatibility guarantees
- No semantic meaning for fields
- No built-in validation
- No deterministic encoding
Devices like AppleWatch, Fitbit use Protocol Buffers for strict schema FDA regulated enforcement.